Dampak Nilai Konsumsi, Utilitas Akuisisi, dan Utilitas Transaksi terhadap Niat Beli dan Perilaku Pembelian Produk Ramah Lingkungan di Indonesia

Syaripudin Syaripudin, Kurniawati Kurniawati

Abstract


Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menguji dampak dari lima nilai konsumsi (yaitu ecological, functional, symbolic, experiential and epistemic) terhadap niat konsumen untuk membeli produk ramah lingkungan serta perilaku konsumsinya. Selain itu, penulis juga menggunakan teori utilitas Thaler untuk mengetahui pengaruh tidak langsung acquisition utility dan transaction utility terhadap niat dan perilaku pembelian. Penulis melakukan survei non-probability sampling dengan teknik purposive sampling kepada masyarakat umum menggunakan google form dengan jumlah responden 200 orang. Hubungan hipotetis dalam model yang diusulkan diuji dengan menggunakan model persamaan struktural (SEM).. Temuan, 6 dari 11 hipotesis yang dikonstruksikan dikonfirmasi. Kesimpulan, perusahaan green product Indonesia perlu memperhatikan functional value, experiential value dan melakukan analisis utilitas sistematis dalam menyusun strategi perusahan.

Kata Kunci: Consumption Values, Green Products, Transaction Utility, Acquisition Utility, Consumption Behavior
Abstract
This study was carried out to examine the impact of five consumption values (ie ecological, functional, symbolic, experiential and epistemic) on consumers' intention to purchase green products and their consumption behavior. In addition, the author also uses Thaler's utility theory to determine the indirect effect of acquisition utility and transaction utility on purchase and behavior intention. The author conducted a non-probability sampling survey with purposive sampling technique to the general public using google form with 200 respondents. The hypothetical relationship in the proposed model was tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). Findings, 6 of the 11 constructed hypotheses were confirmed. Conclusion, Indonesian green product companies need to pay attention to functional value, experiential value and perform a systematic utility analysis in formulating company strategy.

Keywords: Consumption Values, Green Products, Transaction Utility, Acquisition Utility, Consumption Behavior

Full Text:

Download PDF

References


Audrain-Pontevia, A.-F., N’Goala, G., & Poncin, I. (2013). A good deal online: The Impacts of acquisition and transaction value on E-satisfaction and E-loyalty. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 20(5), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2013.04.002

Brough, A. R., Wilkie, J. E. B., Ma, J., Isaac, M. S., & Gal, D. (2016). Is Eco-Friendly Unmanly? The Green-Feminine Stereotype and Its Effect on Sustainable Consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(4), 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw044

Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why Ethical Consumers Don’t Walk Their Talk: Towards a Framework for Understanding the Gap Between the Ethical Purchase Intentions and Actual Buying Behaviour of Ethically Minded Consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0501-6

Chan, R. Y. K. (2001a). Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 18(4), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1013

Chan, R. Y. K. (2001b). Determinants of Chinese consumers’ green purchase behavior. Psychology and Marketing, 18(4), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1013

Chan, R. Y.-K., & Yam, E. (1995). Green movement in a newly industrializing area: A survey on the attitudes and behaviour of the Hong Kong citizens. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 5(4), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2450050405

Chaudhary, R. (2018). Green buying behavior in India: an empirical analysis. Journal of Global Responsibility, 9(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-12-2017-0058

Cronin, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(00)00028-2

dataindonesia.id. (2022). indonesia-hasilkan-2188-juta-ton-sampah-pada-2021. https://dataindonesia.id/ragam/detail/indonesia-hasilkan-2188-juta-ton-sampah-pada-2021

envihsa.fkm.ui.ac.id. (2022). Food Loss and Waste. Https://Envihsa.Fkm.Ui.Ac.Id/2022/05/25/Food-Loss-Food-Waste-Ketika-Makanan-Yang-Terbuang-Menjadi-Masalah-Bagi-Lingkungan/. https://envihsa.fkm.ui.ac.id/2022/05/25/food-loss-food-waste-ketika-makanan-yang-terbuang-menjadi-masalah-bagi-lingkungan/

Firmansyah, F., Purnamasari, P. E., & Djakfar, M. (2019). Religiusitas, lingkungan dan pembelian green product pada konsumen generasi Z. IQTISHODUNA, 1(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.18860/iq.v1i1.5779

Gonçalves, H. M., Lourenço, T. F., & Silva, G. M. (2016). Green buying behavior and the theory of consumption values: A fuzzy-set approach. Journal of Business Research, 69(4), 1484–1491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.129

Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1998). The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252160

Gupta, S., & Kim, H.-W. (2010). Value-driven Internet shopping: The mental accounting theory perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 27(1), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20317

Hur, W.-M., Kim, Y., & Park, K. (2013). Assessing the Effects of Perceived Value and Satisfaction on Customer Loyalty: A ‘Green’ Perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(3), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1280

Jan, I. U., Ji, S., & Yeo, C. (2019). Values and Green Product Purchase Behavior: The Moderating Effects of the Role of Government and Media Exposure. Sustainability, 11(23), 6642. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236642

Khan, S. N., & Mohsin, M. (2017). The power of emotional value: Exploring the effects of values on green product consumer choice behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.187

Kim, H.-W., Chan, H. C., & Gupta, S. (2007). Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2005.05.009

Kim, H.-W., Xu, Y., & Gupta, S. (2012). Which is more important in Internet shopping, perceived price or trust? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(3), 241–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2011.06.003

Kirmani, A., & Baumgartner, H. (2000). Reference Points Used In Quality And Value Judgements. Marketing Letters, 11(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008129011202

Koller, M., Floh, A., & Zauner, A. (2011a). Further insights into perceived value and consumer loyalty: A “Green” perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 28(12), 1154–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20432

Koller, M., Floh, A., & Zauner, A. (2011b). Further insights into perceived value and consumer loyalty: A “Green” perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 28(12), 1154–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20432

kompas.com/sains. (2022). Polusi Indonesia. Kompas.Com/Sains/Read/2022/04/09/130200423/Polusi-Udara-Di-Indonesia--Ini-Daftar-Kota-Paling-Berpolusi-Jakarta-Dan?Page=all. kompas.com/sains/read/2022/04/09/130200423/polusi-udara-di-indonesia--ini-daftar-kota-paling-berpolusi-jakarta-dan?page=all

Lemon, K. N., & Nowlis, S. M. (2002). Developing Synergies between Promotions and Brands in Different Price-Quality Tiers. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(2), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.2.171.19089

Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (1990). Distinguishing Coupon Proneness from Value Consciousness: An Acquisition-Transaction Utility Theory Perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251816

Mazumdar, T., Raj, S. P., & Sinha, I. (2005). Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84

Mohd Suki, N., & Mohd Suki, N. (2015). Consumption values and consumer environmental concern regarding green products. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 22(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1013074

Orth, U. R., & de Marchi, R. (2007). Understanding the Relationships Between Functional, Symbolic, and Experiential Brand Beliefs, Product Experiential Attributes, and Product Schema: Advertising-Trial Interactions Revisited. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 15(3), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679150303

Papista, E., & Krystallis, A. (2013). Investigating the Types of Value and Cost of Green Brands: Proposition of a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(1), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1367-6

Perera, C., Auger, P., & Klein, J. (2018). Green Consumption Practices Among Young Environmentalists: A Practice Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 152(3), 843–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3376-3

Ramirez, E., Jiménez, F. R., & Gau, R. (2015). Concrete and abstract goals associated with the consumption of environmentally sustainable products. European Journal of Marketing, 49(9/10), 1645–1665. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2012-0483

Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(91)90050-8

Shukla, P., Singh, J., & Banerjee, M. (2015). They are not all same: variations in Asian consumers’ value perceptions of luxury brands. Marketing Letters, 26(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-015-9358-x

Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Retailing, 77(2), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00041-0

Thaler, R. (1985). Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.4.3.199

Urbany, J. E., Bearden, W. O., Kaicker, A., & Borrero, M. S. (1997). Transaction utility effects when quality is uncertain. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02894508

White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT Consumer Behaviors to be More Sustainable: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919825649

Worldometers.info. (2022). Current World Population. https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/

Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2017). Determinants of Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecological Economics, 134, 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019

Yan, L. , Keh, H. T. , & & Chen, J. (2021). Assimilating and differentiating the curvilinear effect of social class on green consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(6), 914–936.

Yuan, R., Liu, M. J., & Blut, M. (2022). What’s in it for you? Examining the roles of consumption values and Thaler’s acquisition–transaction utility theory in Chinese consumers’ green purchase intentions. European Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 1065–1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-08-2020-0609

Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251446

Zhao, H., Gao, Q., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhu, X. (2014). What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.021




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v6i1.3347

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Flag Counter

Creative Commons License

S E I K O : Journal of Management & Business is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
 
© All rights reserved 2018. S E I K O : Journal of Management & Business - ISSN (Print) : 2598-831X, ISSN (Online) : 2598-8301.
 

Web
Analytics