Perilaku Inovatif Dalam Competitive Dynamic: Tinjauan Studi Bibliometric
Sari
Abstrak
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggali pemahaman berkaitan dengan studi pada bidang perilaku inovatif dalam rangka melakukan tindakan kompetitif dalam pasar yang semakin ketat persaingannya. Desain penelitian menggunakan sumber data Scopus, metode yang digunakan analisa Bibliometric dan menggunakan software Vos Viewer untuk menggambarkan semua penelitian yang pernah dilakukan sepanjang tahun 1988 – 2020 diperoleh 71 dokumen berbetuk artikel yang relevan dalam penelitian ini. Temuan penelitian adalah produktifitas penelitian, peta tema penelitian yang terdiri dari tujuh kluster dan konsep dan konteks perilaku inovatif dalam level individu, tim dan organisasi serta dinamika persaingan dalam level individu, bisnis dan perusahaan. Implikasi penelitian ini diharapkan mampu memberikan kontribusi bagi pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan khususnya di bidang perilaku inovatif dan dinamika persaingan dan umumnya pada bidang manajemen strategis.
Kata Kunci: Perilaku Inovatif, Competitive Dynamic, Bibliometric, Peta Tema Penelitian.
Abstract
This study aims to explore understanding related to studies in the field of innovative behavior in order to take competitive action in an increasingly competitive market. The research design used the Scopus data source, the method used was Bibliometric analysis and used the Vos Viewer software to describe all research that had been carried out during the years 1988 - 2020, obtained 71 documents in the form of relevant articles in this study. The research findings are research productivity, the research theme map consisting of seven clusters and the concept and context of innovative behavior at the individual, team and organizational levels as well as the dynamics of competition at the individual, business and company levels. The implication of this research is expected to be able to contribute to the development of science, especially in the field of innovative behavior and competitive dynamic and generally in the field of strategic management.
Keywords: Innovative Behavior, Competitive Dynamic, Bibliometric, Research Theme Map.
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Amabile, T. M. (1998). Amabile_1988.Pdf (pp. 77–87).
Baum, J. A. C., & Korn, H. J. (1996). Competitive dynamics of interfirm rivalry. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 255–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/256781
Baumol, W., Boone, J., Carlin, W., David, P., Eberly, J., Ranque, D., Shankerman, M., Solow, R., Trajtenberg, M., Young, A., Reenen, J. Van, & Reenen, V. (2005). Competition and innovation: an inverted-u relationship* p. May.
Beltagui, A., Rosli, A., & Candi, M. (2020). Exaptation in a digital innovation ecosystem: The disruptive impacts of 3D printing. Research Policy, 49(1), 103833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103833
Cabanelas, P., Manfredi, L. C., González-Sánchez, J. M., & Lampón, J. F. (2019). Multimarket competition and innovation in industrial markets: Spain and Colombia in comparative perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 35(3), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-01-2019-0043
Carnahan, S., Agarwal, R., & Campbell, B. (2010). The Effect of Firm Compensation Structures on the Mobility and Entrepreneurship of Extreme Performers. Business, 1096(August 2005), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj
Chen, M. J. (2009). Competitive dynamics research: An insider’s odyssey. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9110-7
Chen, M. J., & Miller, D. (2012). Competitive Dynamics: Themes, Trends, and a Prospective Research Platform. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 135–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2012.660762
Chen, T., Tribbitt, M. A., Yang, Y., & Li, X. (2017). Does rivals’ innovation matter? A competitive dynamics perspective on firms’ product strategy. Journal of Business Research, 76, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.02.016
Cichosz, M., Wallenburg, C. M., & Knemeyer, A. M. (2020). Digital transformation at logistics service providers: barriers, success factors and leading practices. International Journal of Logistics Management, 31(2), 209–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-08-2019-0229
Cozzarin, B. P. (2017). Impact of organizational innovation on product and process innovation. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(5), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1204779
Crowley, F., & Jordan, D. (2017). Does more competition increase business-level innovation? Evidence from domestically focused firms in emerging economies. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 26(5), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2016.1233627
Davcik, N., & Grigoriou, N. (2019). How an unequal intra-firm resources distribution affect market share. Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 38(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-03-2019-0170
Demircioglu, M. A., & Affairs, E. (2020). Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5
Destefanis, A., Neirotti, P., Paolucci, E., & Raguseo, E. (2020). The impact of Airbnb on the economic performance of independent hotels: an empirical investigation of the moderating effects. Current Issues in Tourism, 0(0), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2020.1846501
Eferin, Y., Hohlov, Y., & Rossotto, C. (2019). Digital platforms in Russia: competition between national and foreign multi-sided platforms stimulates growth and innovation. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance , 21(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-11-2018-0065
Hagberg, J., Kjellberg, H., & Cochoy, F. (2020). The Role of Market Devices for Price and Loyalty Strategies in 20th Century U.S. Grocery Stores. Journal of Macromarketing, 40(2), 201–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146719897366
Keuma, D. D. (2020). Penalizing the underdogs? Employment protection and the competitive dynamics of firm innovation. Organization Science, 31(5), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2019.1342
Khatib, S. F. A., Abdullah, D. F., Hendrawaty, E., & Elamer, A. A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of cash holdings literature: current status, development, and agenda for future research. In Management Review Quarterly (Issue 0123456789). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00213-0
Kleer, R., & Piller, F. T. (2019). Local manufacturing and structural shifts in competition: Market dynamics of additive manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 216(September 2018), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.04.019
Kraus, S., Li, H., Kang, Q., Westhead, P., & Tiberius, V. (2020). The sharing economy: a bibliometric analysis of the state-of-the-art. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26(8), 1769–1786. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2020-0438
McIntyre, D. P., Srinivasan, A., & Chintakananda, A. (2020). The persistence of platforms: The role of network, platform, and complementor attributes. Long Range Planning, August 2018, 101987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2020.101987
Moustaghfir, K., El Fatihi, S., & Benouarrek, M. (2020). Human resource management practices, entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: what is the link? Measuring Business Excellence, 24(2), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-12-2019-0119
Neirotti, P., & Pesce, D. (2019). ICT-based innovation and its competitive outcome: the role of information intensity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2018-0039
Pereira, R. M., Borini, F. M., Santos, L. L., & Oliveira, M. de M. (2020). Environmental conditions, subsidiaries’ autonomy and global innovation in multinational enterprises. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 11(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2018-0072
Purc, E., & Lagun, M. (2019). Personal values and innovative behavior of employees. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(APR). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00865
Weinberger, E., Wach, D., Stephan, U., & Wegge, J. (2018). Having a creative day: Understanding entrepreneurs’ daily idea generation through a recovery lens. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.001
Whittaker, D. H., Fath, B., & Fiedler, A. (2020). Open to competition? Competitive density and the growth of young New Zealand ventures. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 343–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219883914
Zhang, R., & Sun, B. (2019). A competitive dynamics perspective on evolutionary game theory, agent-based modeling, and innovation in high-tech firms. Management Decision, 58(5), 948–966. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2018-0666
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/yum.v5i3.3411
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional