Post-crisis Shadow Banking system circumvention: banks and peer to peer industry upside Down in China
Abstract
There are 10 developing and emerging members in 16 members of Regional Consultative Group for Asia. China provides one model from developing and emerging countries to harness shadow banks and fulfill the transformation of market-based finance. The financial policy uncertainty and delay stimulates shadow bank circumvention in the Chinese capital markets during 2010 and 2016. Inadequate regulatory regimes and underdeveloped infrastructure can not walk shoulder to shoulder with the economically booming shadow banking system in China. Two ways in the banking industry and peer to peer industry respectively rake in enormous profit by regulation arbitrage. Complex chains with off-balance sheet financial instruments, inter-bank products, credit alternatives, and small lenders are carried out for shadow money under regulatory oversight. This kind of shadow bank circumvent has undergone short rising and falling period from 2011 to 2019. Under the case study of China which has undergone a life cycle, three key recommendations are rapped to confront circumvent efficiently such as credit reference system, technology energization, and policy perfection.
Keywords: arbitrage; circumvention; shadow bank; peer to peer
Full Text:
Download PDFReferences
Arner, D. W., Barberis, J. N., & Buckley, R. P. (2015). The Evolution of Fintech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm? SSRN Electronic Journal, January. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553
FSB. (2011). Shadow Banking: Scoping the Issues. April, 1–11. https://www.financialstabilityboard.org/publications/r_110412a.pdf%5Cnpapers2://publication/uuid/DFD8EBE2-D6BD-436F-86AA-558693C51400
FSB RCG. (2014). Report on Shadow Banking in Asia. Financial Stability Board Regional Consulta_tive Group for Asia. August, 22. https://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/r_140822c.pdf
Gabor, D. (2018). Goodbye (Chinese) Shadow Banking, Hello Market-based Finance. Development and Change, 49(2), 394–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12387
Helgadóttir, O. (2016). Banking upside down: the implicit politics of shadow banking expertise. Review of International Political Economy, 23(6), 915–940. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2016.1224196
Houston, J. F., Lin, C., & Ma, Y. (2012). Regulatory Arbitrage and International Bank Flows. Journal of Finance, 67(5), 1845–1895. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01774.x
Huang, R. H. (2018). Online P2P Lending and Regulatory Responses in China: Opportunities and Challenges. European Business Organization Law Review, 19(1), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-018-0100-z
Lin, M., Prabhala, N. R., & Viswanathan, S. (2013). Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Management Science, 59(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560
Shen, H., Zhang, M., Liu, R., & Hou, L. (2021). Economic policy uncertainty and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 67(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2021.101542
Sheng, A. (2015). Shadow Banking in China (pp. 63–77). https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814678339_0004
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v4i2.1282
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
